“Send them 100 USDC on Solana.”
Your funds live on Ethereum. Your recipient prefers Solana. Define the destination and let the route connect the two.
Try this intent ↗Don't manage transactions. Just express your intent. A new interface for moving value across chains — built around the outcome you want.
You know where your money should go. You shouldn't need to map every step to get it there.
Choose what the recipient receives: the asset, network and exact amount. Your available funds become the starting point.
The proposed engine evaluates swaps, bridges and network fees to prepare a route that matches your intent.
See the full quote before you approve. Follow each stage of execution through one clear interface.
Explore a simulated transfer. Change the starting asset and destination, review the route, then see your intent become an outcome.
Send 100 USDC to Solana.
Pay with ETH on Ethereum.
One interface brings the journey together. The concept combines route discovery, a transparent quote and explicit approval — with progress visible from source to destination.
Inspect a route ↗Source → quote → approval → destination
A proposed payment layer for people and products, with the chain complexity handled behind the interface.
Your funds live on Ethereum. Your recipient prefers Solana. Define the destination and let the route connect the two.
Try this intent ↗A future checkout could let buyers use supported assets while merchants specify their preferred settlement currency and network.
Explore the flow ↗This website presents the NEXO intent-based finance concept. The demo runs entirely in your browser. It does not connect wallets, execute swaps, bridge assets or move money.
A transaction specifies an action to perform. An intent describes the outcome you want, such as receiving a particular asset on a particular network. An execution system then prepares the steps required to reach that outcome, subject to your conditions and approval.
The simulation includes Ethereum, Solana, Base and Arbitrum. These are illustrative destinations, not live integrations. A production service would require tested integrations and available liquidity for each supported route; universal blockchain compatibility is a design goal, not a current capability.
This demo uses fixed illustrative exchange rates and a simple fee model to explain the experience. A production quote would need current market prices, liquidity, bridge availability, slippage limits and network fees.
You can change your request before confirming this simulation. In a real service, cancellation would depend on the execution stage and protocol. Confirmed blockchain transactions cannot generally be reversed by the interface.